<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on blogging, popularity, and history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/01/thoughts-on-blogging-popularity-and-history.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/01/thoughts-on-blogging-popularity-and-history.html</link>
	<description>--- make your investment cash flow higher than your expenses!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/01/thoughts-on-blogging-popularity-and-history.html/comment-page-1#comment-5275</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/01/thoughts-on-blogging-popularity-and-history.html#comment-5275</guid>
		<description>Great idea, to read only history (and philosophy etc.) only for a year - it really fits the analogy you&#039;re talking about. I remember going through a phase of being addicted to reading the news through Google, now I barely check it, I&#039;m going through blogs and twitter (the worst expression of the model you&#039;re talking about would be people who just read twitter&#039;s trending topics and then, worse, write about them:) - but I don&#039;t do that).

As much as there are many surface changes, there are deeper layers that don&#039;t change as quickly, and in many domains, the deeper layers are where the real issues live anyway, so it can make sense to hang out there for a while - depends on how fast you need to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, to read only history (and philosophy etc.) only for a year &#8211; it really fits the analogy you&#8217;re talking about. I remember going through a phase of being addicted to reading the news through Google, now I barely check it, I&#8217;m going through blogs and twitter (the worst expression of the model you&#8217;re talking about would be people who just read twitter&#8217;s trending topics and then, worse, write about them:) &#8211; but I don&#8217;t do that).</p>
<p>As much as there are many surface changes, there are deeper layers that don&#8217;t change as quickly, and in many domains, the deeper layers are where the real issues live anyway, so it can make sense to hang out there for a while &#8211; depends on how fast you need to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
