<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best posts of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html</link>
	<description>--- a combination of simple living, anticonsumerism, DIY ethics, self-reliance, and applied capitalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8470</guid>
		<description>@brauhster - Tough to say, I my output is about 80% of the probloggers, I write about 5-6 posts per week. Also, I don&#039;t spend a whole lot of time editing and making the posts look pretty. What you see it typically the first draft. I rarely edit or move paragraphs around. If you catch a post right after I publish it you might even notice grammatical errors or copyediting errors, which I fix when I subsequently see them. IOW writing a blog post takes less than an hour, closer to half that. So well-crafted, no ... but I think I can say that many posts are somewhat original without sounding conceited.

My source of inspiration is described here
http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/03/how-to-do-original-research.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brauhster &#8211; Tough to say, I my output is about 80% of the probloggers, I write about 5-6 posts per week. Also, I don&#8217;t spend a whole lot of time editing and making the posts look pretty. What you see it typically the first draft. I rarely edit or move paragraphs around. If you catch a post right after I publish it you might even notice grammatical errors or copyediting errors, which I fix when I subsequently see them. IOW writing a blog post takes less than an hour, closer to half that. So well-crafted, no &#8230; but I think I can say that many posts are somewhat original without sounding conceited.</p>
<p>My source of inspiration is described here<br />
<a href="http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/03/how-to-do-original-research.html" rel="nofollow">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/2008/03/how-to-do-original-research.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brauhster</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8459</link>
		<dc:creator>brauhster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8459</guid>
		<description>How do you find the inspiration to write so many well crafted posts?  I am amazed at your output.  Always thoughtful and interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you find the inspiration to write so many well crafted posts?  I am amazed at your output.  Always thoughtful and interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8452</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8452</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the short version ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the short version <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maus</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8449</link>
		<dc:creator>Maus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8449</guid>
		<description>Godt Nytar, Jacob!  Your posts are consistently good, so the recap is a handy way to see the &quot;big picture.&quot;  I am looking forward to your further insights in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godt Nytar, Jacob!  Your posts are consistently good, so the recap is a handy way to see the &#8220;big picture.&#8221;  I am looking forward to your further insights in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8448</guid>
		<description>@Ademac - Maybe &quot;best&quot; is exaggerating by a bit. I should probably change the title to &quot;Awesome posts of 2009&quot; to downgrade the adjective superlatives a bit 8-) Incidentally, your comment looks suspiciously like some of the comments on previous best posts posts ;-) 

I use these lists to make it easier to find posts I may want to refer back to the in the future, so the main criteria for exclusion is whether it was timely. These lists seem popular for the reason that some do not read all the posts and thus having a long list makes it easier to go back and read the missed issues. It also saves you from having to ignore weekly roundups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ademac &#8211; Maybe &#8220;best&#8221; is exaggerating by a bit. I should probably change the title to &#8220;Awesome posts of 2009&#8243; to downgrade the adjective superlatives a bit <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Incidentally, your comment looks suspiciously like some of the comments on previous best posts posts <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I use these lists to make it easier to find posts I may want to refer back to the in the future, so the main criteria for exclusion is whether it was timely. These lists seem popular for the reason that some do not read all the posts and thus having a long list makes it easier to go back and read the missed issues. It also saves you from having to ignore weekly roundups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ademac</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ademac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8447</guid>
		<description>Rescind my previous statement. I went back and read the post again. I missed the line &quot; it serves more as a roundup than as a statement of value&quot;

My bad
Ademac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rescind my previous statement. I went back and read the post again. I missed the line &#8221; it serves more as a roundup than as a statement of value&#8221;</p>
<p>My bad<br />
Ademac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ademac</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/the-best-posts-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-8446</link>
		<dc:creator>Ademac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=2532#comment-8446</guid>
		<description>Jacob,
The Best posts of 2009, looks suspicously like all the posts of 2009. What critera did you use to determine the best posts? or was the whole year that good?

Just curious
Ademac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob,<br />
The Best posts of 2009, looks suspicously like all the posts of 2009. What critera did you use to determine the best posts? or was the whole year that good?</p>
<p>Just curious<br />
Ademac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

