<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the down market means for extreme early retirement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html</link>
	<description>Becoming debt-free is the first step to building a better world. Financial independence is the second. Doing what YOU want is the third.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deegee</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-18351</link>
		<dc:creator>deegee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 02:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-18351</guid>
		<description>Good post, Jacob.

The down market of 2008-2009 was very helpful to me when I ERed in November, 2008.  The bond fund I use my company stock (ESOP) proceeds to buy into was down about 20%-25% from its usual levels.  This enabled me to buy 20%-25% more shares than I expected.  So, as long as the monthly dividend was not 20%-25% lower than its norm, I would come out ahead.

What happened was that the monthly dividend did drop a little in early 2009 but rebounded later in the year.  Even though it has fluctuated in the last 2 years it has never been worse than 10%-15% below its norm so I have been able to generate more dividend income than I had originally budgeted.

I was also able to buy additional shares while the bond fund&#039;s NAV remained low in 2009 so I have additional shares to offset any slight decline in the monthly dividend per share.  Furthermore, cap gain distributions from the fund, while taxable, get reinvested and that further boosts the number of shares I own and the subsequent monthly dividends.

In short, the down market was a huge blessing for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Jacob.</p>
<p>The down market of 2008-2009 was very helpful to me when I ERed in November, 2008.  The bond fund I use my company stock (ESOP) proceeds to buy into was down about 20%-25% from its usual levels.  This enabled me to buy 20%-25% more shares than I expected.  So, as long as the monthly dividend was not 20%-25% lower than its norm, I would come out ahead.</p>
<p>What happened was that the monthly dividend did drop a little in early 2009 but rebounded later in the year.  Even though it has fluctuated in the last 2 years it has never been worse than 10%-15% below its norm so I have been able to generate more dividend income than I had originally budgeted.</p>
<p>I was also able to buy additional shares while the bond fund&#8217;s NAV remained low in 2009 so I have additional shares to offset any slight decline in the monthly dividend per share.  Furthermore, cap gain distributions from the fund, while taxable, get reinvested and that further boosts the number of shares I own and the subsequent monthly dividends.</p>
<p>In short, the down market was a huge blessing for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windfeld</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-18346</link>
		<dc:creator>Windfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-18346</guid>
		<description>[quote]Incidentally, I’ll lend money to the government the day they pay interest in gold  There’s a certain moral hazard associated with lending money to people who can print money at will to pay you back.[/quote]

True.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]Incidentally, I’ll lend money to the government the day they pay interest in gold  There’s a certain moral hazard associated with lending money to people who can print money at will to pay you back.[/quote]</p>
<p>True.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-16490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-16490</guid>
		<description>@tmgbooks - It seems to come down to gambling on stocks and avoiding the annuity management fee. As far as I understand those are pretty high as in 1.5-2.0%. I think that&#039;s a lot to pay for the &quot;swap&quot; given that the annuity company is likely gambling on stocks as well.
That said, I&#039;d be interested in knowing which companies offer inflation adjusted annuities to people which are expected to live for 50+ additional years.

Incidentally, I&#039;ll lend money to the government the day they pay interest in gold :) There&#039;s a certain moral hazard associated with lending money to people who can print money at will to pay you back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tmgbooks &#8211; It seems to come down to gambling on stocks and avoiding the annuity management fee. As far as I understand those are pretty high as in 1.5-2.0%. I think that&#8217;s a lot to pay for the &#8220;swap&#8221; given that the annuity company is likely gambling on stocks as well.<br />
That said, I&#8217;d be interested in knowing which companies offer inflation adjusted annuities to people which are expected to live for 50+ additional years.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I&#8217;ll lend money to the government the day they pay interest in gold <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  There&#8217;s a certain moral hazard associated with lending money to people who can print money at will to pay you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmgbooks</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-16488</link>
		<dc:creator>tmgbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-16488</guid>
		<description>Ok. You need $5,000 to cover your annual cost of living. Why gamble on stocks? (The stock market is a gamble in the short-term  regardless of what anyone tells you; and as Jacob wrote: the market has gone flat before for 10 - 15 years at a time.)

To be truly FI you need guaranteed returns. So, if you need $5,000 a year, you need enough in 30 year bonds (or an annuity) to cover that.

But, then, you need to account for the possible and likely effect of inflation on that income. But inflation will seldom affect all our indiviudal consumptions equally. Food is probably it but one can obviate that by growing some of the necessities, composting, and keeping chickens.

The tricky part is housing; even if you own your home without a mortgage a single-family residence is probably the most expensive option. I own four rental units (free and clear), live in one and the others provide me income and inflation protection because I can raise the rents to keep that income constant.

I keep half my money in cash and half in bonds although I don&#039;t need income from either to meet my living expenses since I own an inflation-adjusted annuity that is almost double my cost of living.

Certainly, it is possible to accomplish FI using stocks (or playing the lottery, or 21 in Vegas) but I don&#039;t believe it is prudent or hardly the most desirable or even sustainable means to that end.

I see the stock market as a gambler&#039;s ploy to avoid the longer-haul of saving enough to buy sufficient 30 year (Federal government) bonds or some form of federally-insured annuity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. You need $5,000 to cover your annual cost of living. Why gamble on stocks? (The stock market is a gamble in the short-term  regardless of what anyone tells you; and as Jacob wrote: the market has gone flat before for 10 &#8211; 15 years at a time.)</p>
<p>To be truly FI you need guaranteed returns. So, if you need $5,000 a year, you need enough in 30 year bonds (or an annuity) to cover that.</p>
<p>But, then, you need to account for the possible and likely effect of inflation on that income. But inflation will seldom affect all our indiviudal consumptions equally. Food is probably it but one can obviate that by growing some of the necessities, composting, and keeping chickens.</p>
<p>The tricky part is housing; even if you own your home without a mortgage a single-family residence is probably the most expensive option. I own four rental units (free and clear), live in one and the others provide me income and inflation protection because I can raise the rents to keep that income constant.</p>
<p>I keep half my money in cash and half in bonds although I don&#8217;t need income from either to meet my living expenses since I own an inflation-adjusted annuity that is almost double my cost of living.</p>
<p>Certainly, it is possible to accomplish FI using stocks (or playing the lottery, or 21 in Vegas) but I don&#8217;t believe it is prudent or hardly the most desirable or even sustainable means to that end.</p>
<p>I see the stock market as a gambler&#8217;s ploy to avoid the longer-haul of saving enough to buy sufficient 30 year (Federal government) bonds or some form of federally-insured annuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-5276</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t say I wasn&#039;t scared sometimes between Oct. 2008 and Feb. 2009, but I did continue buying when I got the cash.  I deliberately went out and bought into three new positions that I&#039;d been looking at for a while, then sensing that the time could never be better.  One of those I managed to get at what must have been at least its five-year low.  It has just about doubled since then.  The next time something like this happens, I&#039;ll be sure to have the extra cash set aside for being able to jump on the opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t say I wasn&#8217;t scared sometimes between Oct. 2008 and Feb. 2009, but I did continue buying when I got the cash.  I deliberately went out and bought into three new positions that I&#8217;d been looking at for a while, then sensing that the time could never be better.  One of those I managed to get at what must have been at least its five-year low.  It has just about doubled since then.  The next time something like this happens, I&#8217;ll be sure to have the extra cash set aside for being able to jump on the opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad @ Sentient Money</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2918</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad @ Sentient Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2918</guid>
		<description>This is definitely a buying opportunity, just like last year at this time was a selling opportunity.  GE at $13 and roughly 10% dividend last week...just plain awesome.

More buying opportunities ahead for many stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is definitely a buying opportunity, just like last year at this time was a selling opportunity.  GE at $13 and roughly 10% dividend last week&#8230;just plain awesome.</p>
<p>More buying opportunities ahead for many stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneyblogga</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2884</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneyblogga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2884</guid>
		<description>I noticed the exact same thing!  PF bloggers who were so usually open and full of themselves regarding how great things were going for them have suddenly quit blogging. One of my daily reads has gone AWOL.  Wassup with that? Just because the market tanked and took your investments with it doesn&#039;t mean that you&#039;re a failure, guys! Suck it up, pull up a chair, and come eat some humble pie with ninnies like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the exact same thing!  PF bloggers who were so usually open and full of themselves regarding how great things were going for them have suddenly quit blogging. One of my daily reads has gone AWOL.  Wassup with that? Just because the market tanked and took your investments with it doesn&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;re a failure, guys! Suck it up, pull up a chair, and come eat some humble pie with ninnies like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dividend Growth Investor</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividend Growth Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>I am biased of course but I also believe that dividend/income investing is the way to go as long as the investor follows these rules:

1) diversify accross industries
2) diversify across companies ( hold at least 30+)
3) focus more on dividend growth prospects and less on the highest dividend yield
4) make sure you research your positions and that their dividends are adequately covered
5) sell after a dividend cut, but hold on if the dividend is kept unchanged
6) If you are ready to live off your cash flows, place at least 25% of your portfolio in fixed income. I am a fan of laddered CD&#039;s, as the only risk there is inflationary as long as you are not over the fdic limits.
7) As a general rule i would prefer to own my place of residence at retirement so that I am &quot;hedged&quot; against rent increases and in the worst case scenario live off my house either through a reverse mortgage or sell it a move into a smaller house in smaller towns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am biased of course but I also believe that dividend/income investing is the way to go as long as the investor follows these rules:</p>
<p>1) diversify accross industries<br />
2) diversify across companies ( hold at least 30+)<br />
3) focus more on dividend growth prospects and less on the highest dividend yield<br />
4) make sure you research your positions and that their dividends are adequately covered<br />
5) sell after a dividend cut, but hold on if the dividend is kept unchanged<br />
6) If you are ready to live off your cash flows, place at least 25% of your portfolio in fixed income. I am a fan of laddered CD&#8217;s, as the only risk there is inflationary as long as you are not over the fdic limits.<br />
7) As a general rule i would prefer to own my place of residence at retirement so that I am &#8220;hedged&#8221; against rent increases and in the worst case scenario live off my house either through a reverse mortgage or sell it a move into a smaller house in smaller towns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjukr</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>mjukr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>So when are you going to start selling the &quot;Jacob&#039;s Funds Newsletter&quot;???

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when are you going to start selling the &#8220;Jacob&#8217;s Funds Newsletter&#8221;???</p>
<p> <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>@Judith - There are three answers.
1) I used to use the 4% rule. If 4% of your stock investments exceeds your living expenses, you&#039;re historically good for at least 30 years and in some cases forever. I am still below that number i.e. annual expenses are less than 4% of my invested assets. Technically, once you cross it, the fluctuations should cover you. For instance, if you pull the plug in an up market, you will see the number drifting up as the market goes down, but that&#039;s okay since future appreciation of your stocks will be higher thus compensating. 
2) Since 2005 my capital gains + capital income as per my tax return have been higher than my expenses. Not every year, but if you keep a running average. Later on I have become smarter about realizing losses to cancel out gains so I ideally pay close to no taxes.
3) I started the quest for income/cash flow at the beginning of 2007 - it was gradual, so I currently do not have quite enough dividends from individual funds to cover my expenses ($6000). Dividends currently stand close to $5000/year. There are also dividends from funds to be added on top of those but it is always hard to predict what fund dividends are going to be so I&#039;m not counting those in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Judith &#8211; There are three answers.<br />
1) I used to use the 4% rule. If 4% of your stock investments exceeds your living expenses, you&#8217;re historically good for at least 30 years and in some cases forever. I am still below that number i.e. annual expenses are less than 4% of my invested assets. Technically, once you cross it, the fluctuations should cover you. For instance, if you pull the plug in an up market, you will see the number drifting up as the market goes down, but that&#8217;s okay since future appreciation of your stocks will be higher thus compensating.<br />
2) Since 2005 my capital gains + capital income as per my tax return have been higher than my expenses. Not every year, but if you keep a running average. Later on I have become smarter about realizing losses to cancel out gains so I ideally pay close to no taxes.<br />
3) I started the quest for income/cash flow at the beginning of 2007 &#8211; it was gradual, so I currently do not have quite enough dividends from individual funds to cover my expenses ($6000). Dividends currently stand close to $5000/year. There are also dividends from funds to be added on top of those but it is always hard to predict what fund dividends are going to be so I&#8217;m not counting those in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>Jacob-

You declared that you became financially independent a few years ago. As the market decreased since then, is that still true? does your current investment income still cover your current level of expenses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob-</p>
<p>You declared that you became financially independent a few years ago. As the market decreased since then, is that still true? does your current investment income still cover your current level of expenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>@Trug - Indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Trug &#8211; Indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trug</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2862</link>
		<dc:creator>Trug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2862</guid>
		<description>Your goals are clear enough but your income-producing risk assets don&#039;t exist in a vacuum.  Meaning dividend yields can decline, along with the underlying stock, destroying your capital.  This is happening right now.
Also, junk bonds are paying 16-20% in this environment. There&#039;s a message there for a stock buyer who has no residual claims for the underlying company assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your goals are clear enough but your income-producing risk assets don&#8217;t exist in a vacuum.  Meaning dividend yields can decline, along with the underlying stock, destroying your capital.  This is happening right now.<br />
Also, junk bonds are paying 16-20% in this environment. There&#8217;s a message there for a stock buyer who has no residual claims for the underlying company assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2861</guid>
		<description>@FB - Since I&#039;m mainly in (semi)-solid (about 50/50 mix by position .. in terms of position size, the solids dominate though) dividend payers, I have been doing better than the market. Unless the emotional state of the market changes, I expect to do less well than the market on the way up. I simply have a lower beta. It&#039;s not that I&#039;m making superior calls.

I am sorry to report that the funds I hold (about 25% of my fortune) have been doing way better than market and better than me too. A solid blow to my ego. One of them (the largest, HSGFX) is down 15%, another (FPACX) down 25%, PRPFX down about the same .. the one that took the heaviest hit was DODFX.

I don&#039;t think any of them are doing worse than the market, DODFX is on par depending on which day you check. 

Who said I&#039;m not market timing? ;-) No, I&#039;m not picking trends or bottoms, but there are times to sell, .. well in my case buy less .. and then there are times to buy more. I&#039;m picking statistical outcomes. Right now, long terms gains are likely to be high. Short term? Who knows? Who cares? I&#039;m still getting income (that&#039;s what I care about). 

Currently, I am moving money from stocks that have held up and putting them in things that have been punished. I&#039;m also decreasing my cash position with the goal of getting it down to 5% ... and then there&#039;s of course new cash.

As for inflation, some dividend payers tend to increase their dividends often 10-20% although lately that has kinda sucked. You have the same inflation problem with an asset based model though and don&#039;t forget that the underlying stocks are still assets. This is also why I&#039;m not too keen on bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FB &#8211; Since I&#8217;m mainly in (semi)-solid (about 50/50 mix by position .. in terms of position size, the solids dominate though) dividend payers, I have been doing better than the market. Unless the emotional state of the market changes, I expect to do less well than the market on the way up. I simply have a lower beta. It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m making superior calls.</p>
<p>I am sorry to report that the funds I hold (about 25% of my fortune) have been doing way better than market and better than me too. A solid blow to my ego. One of them (the largest, HSGFX) is down 15%, another (FPACX) down 25%, PRPFX down about the same .. the one that took the heaviest hit was DODFX.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think any of them are doing worse than the market, DODFX is on par depending on which day you check. </p>
<p>Who said I&#8217;m not market timing? <img src='http://earlyretirementextreme.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  No, I&#8217;m not picking trends or bottoms, but there are times to sell, .. well in my case buy less .. and then there are times to buy more. I&#8217;m picking statistical outcomes. Right now, long terms gains are likely to be high. Short term? Who knows? Who cares? I&#8217;m still getting income (that&#8217;s what I care about). </p>
<p>Currently, I am moving money from stocks that have held up and putting them in things that have been punished. I&#8217;m also decreasing my cash position with the goal of getting it down to 5% &#8230; and then there&#8217;s of course new cash.</p>
<p>As for inflation, some dividend payers tend to increase their dividends often 10-20% although lately that has kinda sucked. You have the same inflation problem with an asset based model though and don&#8217;t forget that the underlying stocks are still assets. This is also why I&#8217;m not too keen on bonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugal Bachelor</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2860</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugal Bachelor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2860</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post. You are one of the main people I&#039;m wondering how they&#039;ve been doing.

You are right about looking at the income. It has been easier for me to look at assets just because I can figure out how many years and then figure out how much money. Looking at income is tough for me because it&#039;s difficult to adjust for inflation (it seems like you need to keep putting more and more money). I need to start looking at this model more closely.

One thing I don&#039;t understand is how it&#039;s a buying opportunity. How do you have cash? Are you moving money from cash to stocks (- and if so how is this not timing the market? -), or just new cash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post. You are one of the main people I&#8217;m wondering how they&#8217;ve been doing.</p>
<p>You are right about looking at the income. It has been easier for me to look at assets just because I can figure out how many years and then figure out how much money. Looking at income is tough for me because it&#8217;s difficult to adjust for inflation (it seems like you need to keep putting more and more money). I need to start looking at this model more closely.</p>
<p>One thing I don&#8217;t understand is how it&#8217;s a buying opportunity. How do you have cash? Are you moving money from cash to stocks (- and if so how is this not timing the market? -), or just new cash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>@mattg - If you&#039;re not confident or do not want to spend  years learning it, you could always get an ETF that focuses on blue chip dividend payers like DVY (there are others!). For individual selection, about 20 companies is the sweet spot. It&#039;s hard to keep track of more and if they are selected from different sectors, you get rid of almost as much company risk as a broad market index without hiding your performers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mattg &#8211; If you&#8217;re not confident or do not want to spend  years learning it, you could always get an ETF that focuses on blue chip dividend payers like DVY (there are others!). For individual selection, about 20 companies is the sweet spot. It&#8217;s hard to keep track of more and if they are selected from different sectors, you get rid of almost as much company risk as a broad market index without hiding your performers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneymonk</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>I always say, net worth is a joke and cash flow is better

http://www.moneymonk.net/2008/03/net-worth-is-joke-cash-flow-is-better.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always say, net worth is a joke and cash flow is better</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymonk.net/2008/03/net-worth-is-joke-cash-flow-is-better.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.moneymonk.net/2008/03/net-worth-is-joke-cash-flow-is-better.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired Syd</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired Syd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the same note, pf bloggers have also gotten awfully quiet about the 100 push up challenge, but I digress (as usual).&quot;

Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the same note, pf bloggers have also gotten awfully quiet about the 100 push up challenge, but I digress (as usual).&#8221;</p>
<p>Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattg</title>
		<link>http://earlyretirementextreme.com/what-the-down-market-means-fo-extreme-early-retiremen.html/comment-page-1#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>mattg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earlyretirementextreme.com/?p=930#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>A sort of off-topic question: What is your definition of a diversified portfolio for ERE?  I ask this because I am wary of picking my own stocks (I am not confident as of yet that I would be able to separate the large, strong companies from the large, weak ones).  I like the dividend idea and wealth defined as stream of income.  But I&#039;m not about to go throw lots of money into a handful of companies, because even with all the research I would do on them, one may still go bust.  Ouch.

What I really am asking is how/why you are confident that your individual selections aren&#039;t going to go bust and wreak havoc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sort of off-topic question: What is your definition of a diversified portfolio for ERE?  I ask this because I am wary of picking my own stocks (I am not confident as of yet that I would be able to separate the large, strong companies from the large, weak ones).  I like the dividend idea and wealth defined as stream of income.  But I&#8217;m not about to go throw lots of money into a handful of companies, because even with all the research I would do on them, one may still go bust.  Ouch.</p>
<p>What I really am asking is how/why you are confident that your individual selections aren&#8217;t going to go bust and wreak havoc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

